Writing and publishing important scientific articles a reviewers perspective

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. It functions to encourage authors to meet the accepted high standards of their discipline and to control the dissemination of research data to ensure that unwarranted claims, unacceptable interpretations or personal views are not published without prior expert review. Within the scientific community, peer review has become an essential component of the academic writing process. It helps ensure that papers published in scientific journals answer meaningful research questions and draw accurate conclusions based on professionally executed experimentation.

Writing and publishing important scientific articles a reviewers perspective

Nevertheless, establishing a record of publication is essential if you intend to pursue a career as an academic or scientific researcher.

writing and publishing important scientific articles a reviewers perspective

These five suggestions will help you turn the odds in your favor and make the publishing process less daunting. Target an Appropriate Journal It may be tempting to submit your article to one of the top journals in your field: But remember, the top professional journals are exceedingly competitive.

The types of academic projects that get published in such journals are generally groundbreaking studies of great significance, many of which rely on the scholarship of multiple authors. Moreover, these articles are often the result of considerable research budgets and institutional support. Not to mention the decades of experience and the publication records of the authors.

Those who are still completing degrees should consider submitting an article to a student oriented journal such as Student Pulse the Council on Undergraduate Research also publishes a good list of student oriented publications.

Student journals are a good place to begin your publication record while at the same time improving your understanding of the publication process and receiving feedback on your ideas. When choosing a journal, you want to keep in mind two factors: You should expect most reviews to take several months at a minimum.

Meanwhile, most journals do not accept an article for review that is simultaneously being reviewed by another journal. Say Something New No journal is going to take interest in your work if it does not present new or novel ideas.

To get your work published, you need to say something new without saying something that calls your credibility into question. Successful academic articles do two things: By using existing work as a starting point the shoulders of giantswe can push the envelope just a little further and discover new things.

For a good article, this is only the starting point: To be attractive to an academic publisher, your work needs to strike a balance between saying something new and at the same time remaining grounded in the existing pool of knowledge. Edit Your Work Extensively You need to have a serious editing and revision process if you intend to publish your work, one that goes beyond the quick skim you might give a paper before passing it in for a class.

Start by doing something very old fashioned: When you edit your own work, you need to give yourself plenty of time between when you actually do your writing and when you do your editing. There are a two things you can look for in your editing process that, when addressed, will markedly improve the quality of your paper: When it comes to your writing style, simpler is better.

This point should be emphasized: If your writing is littered with commas, semi-colons, and dashes, go back and simplify. As you edit your paper, be your own worst nightmare: Avoid the Passive Voice: If you are unfamiliar with the passive voice, start by reading a basic overview.The article discusses various complex and interrelated quality issues mediating reviewers' expectations and standards.

Authors must meet or exceed reviewers' and editors' expectations of providing convincing arguments and support of the importance and relevancy of the research topic and questions, evidence of scientific rigorousness, and meaningful and usefulness of the findings making.

Writing and publishing important scientific articles: A reviewer's perspective and elements relating to undertaking important and relevant research endeavors and writing important scientific articles that offer meaningful and useful contributions to the ever-growing marketing literature.

Journal editors and editorial reviewers are key. HOW TO WRITE A SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE. Barbara J.

writing and publishing important scientific articles a reviewers perspective

Hoogenboom, PT, EdD, SCS, To begin it might be interesting to learn why reviewers accept manuscripts! Tips for writing and publishing an article.

Ann Pharmaco. ; ‐ 2. With the existing insights on writing and publishing marketing journal articles and the discipline’s rapid expansion of publishing opportunities in new U.S.

Looking for the full-text?

and international marketing journals. How to Write a Scientific Review Article. into the existing body of knowledge.” Importantly, a review should present results clearly and accurately—good writing is essential and must follow a strict set of rules.

publishers, editors, and students to learn and share their experience about research and publishing. Enago Academy also. Writing for academic journals is a highly competitive activity, and it’s important to understand that there could be several reasons behind a rejection. Furthermore, the journal peer-review process is an essential element of publication because no writer could identify and address all potential issues with a manuscript.

Writing and publishing important scientific articles: A reviewer's perspective - ScienceDirect