A comparison of the protagonist and antagonist relationship with each other and other jurors in the

So, I now present to you, my plot structure worksheet—I hope it proves useful to you. The basic plot structure could be used in some context for most genres with some adjustment, but assumes a simple three-act story. This is the pre-story where we introduce the main character s and the world in which they live.

A comparison of the protagonist and antagonist relationship with each other and other jurors in the

12 Angry Men Essay

I suspect the similarities are easier to find by reading the play because the movie really shows their contrasts. There is one similarity in that when they really believe something, they are passionate about their cause. He is prepared to allow anyone to keep their own opinion without compromising his own.

A nineteen-year old man is on trial for the murder of his father. The defendant has a criminal record and a lot of circumstantial evidence piled against him. The defendant, if found guilty, would receive a mandatory death penalty.

The jury is sent to a hot, crowded room to deliberate.

The Basics of Writing Fiction

Before any formal discussion, they cast a vote. That juror, who is known in the script as Juror 8 is the protagonist of the play. As the tempers flare and the arguments begin, the audience learns about each member of the jury.

At the beginning of the play, eleven of the jurors believe that the boy killed his father. They summarize the compelling evidence of the trial: He then witnessed a young man, supposedly the defendant, running away.

He failed to remember the names of the films. Juror 8 picks apart each piece of evidence to persuade the others. Here are some of the observations: Because her eyesight is in question, the jury decides that she is not a reliable witness.

Every juror has a different emotional pattern that makes the play interesting. In my opinion there were 3 main jurors 12 Angry Men 12 Angry Men A persons surroundings can influence him. Eight … in the jury room: Juror 8, Juror 3 and Juror 9. Juror 8 is important because he is smart, brave, and fair.

Juror 3 was important because he was the antagonist, he was mean, and he was intolerant. Juror 9 was important because he wasn? Juror 8 was a very important juror, he was the protagonist. He was the one that proved the truth.

Juror 8 was very smart, he bought a knife similar to 12 Angry Men 12 Angry MenA persons surroundings can influence him. Eight a caring man, … the one used in the crime to prove that is easy to get an identical knife, and he proved that it was impossible for the old man to make it to the scene of the crime in 15 seconds like he testified.

Juror 8 was also brave.

Antagonist: The character who opposes or challenges the main character. The antagonist does not have to be a villain and can be something other than human. For example, nature in “The Call of the Wild.”. Atmosphere: The mood or feeling. Catharsis: The purifying of . Analogy—Another umbrella term, similar to the definition of comparison, referring to any comparison that explores the similarities or differences between two things. Juxtaposition —Placing two concepts, characters, ideas, etc., near each other so that the reader makes comparisons between them and perhaps contrasts them as well. Now that we know who everyone is, what they want, and what their role is in the story, it’s time to figure out how they interact with each other. How To Make a Character Interaction Chart To start, list all character names in the left column and the top row, beginning with the protagonist.

He was the only one that voted not guilty in the first vote and he standed for what he believed in and confronted everybody. In addition, Juror 8 was also fair. He said 12 Angry Men 12 Angry Men: Influence of Surroundings A persons surroundings can influence him. He also listened to everyone? Juror 3 was also a very important juror in the jury room.

Juror 3 was the antagonist. Juror 8 is the Most Important Juror Juror 8 was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number … believing that the boy was not guilty. Juror 3 was also mean.

He wanted everyone to think the way he did, and lost his temper whenever they didn? In addition, Juror 3 was also intolerant.

Describe at least one important conflict in the text s One important conflict in the drama script 12 angry men by Reginald Rose was between Juror number 3 and Juror number 8.

Their contrasting personalities and different beliefs caused conflict between them throughout the entire play. He was the only juror willing to rifle through the evidence to try and figure out whether the defendant in question was guilty or not.

Number 8 was the only juror who voted not guilty in the first vote causing conflict amongst the other jurors.

A comparison of the protagonist and antagonist relationship with each other and other jurors in the

This proves to us that unlike juror 8, juror number 3 does not hold the integrity value.English 12 angry men. STUDY. PLAY. In your own words, state what instructions the judge gives to the jurors. How is this antagonist different from the other jurors?

Juror 3, loud, bossy, and opinionated. What will be the cause of the conflict between the protagonist and antagonist? Arguing about the guilt of the boy.

Scandal (Series) - TV Tropes

To quickly identify and. You just clipped your first slide! Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later. Now customize the name of a clipboard to store your clips.

Character List

Armoured Closet Gay. Sully St. James. Sally Langston's husband to a somewhat lesser extent.; The Artifact: Virtually all of Olivia's team besides Huck and later on Quinn is now more-or-less useless to her other than an extra pair of hands to help sort through rutadeltambor.com dark centered plot the show is headed makes their wacky character shticks rather out of place, and only Huck has any.

In analyzing the differences in the antagonist's and protagonist's relationship with each other and the other jurors, it too held to the play's guidelines with the various alliances and verbal sparring making sense in light of each juror's moral alignment and personality.

protagonist and being antagonist affect the story? 1. Compare Sonia to Hannah. How does each character help Connor and Risa in their own unique way?

2.

A comparison of the protagonist and antagonist relationship with each other and other jurors in the

4. Do you feel Connor and Lev can ever trust each other again? Why or why not? 5. In literature, conflict is a literary element that involves a struggle between two opposing forces, usually a protagonist and an antagonist.

Internal and External Conflicts Careful examination of some conflict examples will help us realize that they may be internal or external.

Esperanza Rising Conflict Analysis and Synopsis